|
Ne Shqip Music ju ofrojme free music shqiptare, music videos, free music downloads, dergim te music videos ne email, shkarkime falas, dhe mp3 music shqip. Kerkoni me lart per cdo kengetar ose kenge te cdo lloj rryme muzikore dhe degjoni music pa fund. Gjithashtu ju mund te merni video per ne profilet tuaja ne abayoung.com, myspace.com, hi5.com, etj... duke bere copy/paste kodin qe ndodhet posht cdo music video.
|
|
|
|
|
9/11 Debate: Loose Change vs. Popular Mechanics pt. 4
Pershkrimi videos:September 11, 2001 - five years after the attacks many people are asking questions about what happened on that day in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. Websites, articles, books and documentaries have put forward a variety of alternate theories to the government's account of what happened. The most popular of these is a documentary called "Loose Change." Now, a book dealing with many of these theories has just been published by the magazine Popular Mechanics, it's called "Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts." In a Democracy Now! national broadcast exclusive, we host a debate between the filmmakers of Loose Change and the editors of Popular Mechanics on 9/11.
Video te Peraferta:
Komentet: Shfaqi || Fshehi
Dergoje Videon:














Since you asked..
I don't necessarily think Bush had anything to do with the planning, he could barely plan breakfast. There are alot of people behind the scenes, or even Cheney himself, who benefit financially. I also think it's possible they thought they were making a good decision for the people, and that the people just don't realise it. Ends justify the means. Greed, fear and lack of empathy make evil people.
The Third Tower: The Fires: v=gbIr7Ln4fXY
Or the twoofers bullshit version of events
Coming from you, that is just too hysterical, pathetic hypocrite, you haven't been right about anything yet.
Trouble is you have to prove it!
But you cant.
And you're not interested in trying to prove your theories either, because with any critical thinking ability you would realise that the inside job stuff is utter garbage. It would be impossible to plan, execute & then keep secret such a heinous crime.
Of course, the acceptance of that would ruin the whole point of you & the rest of you 'truthers' being here......to promote your anti-USA agenda by deceit.
BULLSHIT. You have zero scientifically verifiable evidence to support your laughable claim.
Are they going to infer that the commentators knew about the "conspiracy"??
Lame.
"I'm not calling anybody a liar, sir..(half a second later)... I'm calling you a liar."
Bermas is an idiot.
Same goes for the governments collapse theory.Its called "Tentitive Theory" unproven and not worth our time.
So yes! you are indeed a laughable clown greywolf424.
~terrymanning1~
This actually reveals your agenda.
You think the truth movement is anti-american. This is what you're fighting against. You're not looking for truth you're pushing back on the "anti-american" truthers.
You're just a nationalist like most OCTers.
In what way does my stance "reveal my agenda" as you put it?
I didnt say the 'truth' movement is entirely anti-USA, but it's leaders have three possible agendas:
1) Make money from gullible people who have an anti-authority disposition.
2) Promote an anti-Bush/USA political agenda.
3) Or both.
And I already know the REAL truth about 9/11. Its all in the official reports, of which NOTHING has been disproven by the laughably named 'truth' movement.
No, it isn't.
When governments stage false flag operations, the reports they release aren't truthful. The official reports released after pearl harbour didn't reveal they knew about it and let it happen. Official accounts of the Gulf of tonkin lie didn't reveal it was staged by the US. That would be counterproductive and defeat the purpose. Think for yourself.
Before you can accuse the official reports of not being truthful, you have to prove that 9/11 was a 'false flag' operation. 'Truthers' alot smarter than you have been trying to do that for years now & come up with ZERO evidence. NOTHING!
The past is not proof 9/11 was a false flag operation. Try again.
You're right past false flag ops don't prove 9/11 was, but there's a pattern.
The typical OCTer upon initially hearing the possibility 9/11 was an inside job went "BULLSHIT!" and set about proving he was right. Smart people said "hmm that's interesting I want to learn more". That's the difference. To believe it wasn't an inside job you have to ignore hundreds of bizarre coincidences
Circumstantial evidence is not evidence! Its the product of imagination. Loose Change is a typical example of that. Avery wrote LC a fictional script that he then claimed as fact. He has since admitted LC is full of errors, dubious claims & comes to conclusions not backed up by facts. But you know that. You've seen the Hardfire debate no doubt.
Around every major world/news event conspiracy theorists spring up because there are gullible people willing to buy into their lies.
It's a flaw in your cognitive functioning to group everyone as "conspiracy theorists" as if it's an ailment, and these people have some agenda. In that group you're including Firemen, congressmen, victims families, engineers, architects, pilots, general public etc.
If Loose Change first edition was fact, why have they dropped so much of it from later editions? Surely there's only one truth, right?
You wont find ANY of it in LC.
Some errors: Fake calls. Pods under aircraft. Missiles fired before planes hit towers. No plane crash at Shanksville. Saying the official story said jet fuel vaporised AA77. Stand down orders....I could go on.
What amazes me is that people like you still give LC any credibility! THEY LIED! Not errors. LIES.