Lolita 1962 vs Lolita 1997

Ne Shqip Music ju ofrojme free music shqiptare, music videos, free music downloads, dergim te music videos ne email, shkarkime falas, dhe mp3 music shqip. Kerkoni me lart per cdo kengetar ose kenge te cdo lloj rryme muzikore dhe degjoni music pa fund. Gjithashtu ju mund te merni video per ne profilet tuaja ne abayoung.com, myspace.com, hi5.com, etj... duke bere copy/paste kodin qe ndodhet posht cdo music video.

Disa Artist & Grupe:

Lolita 1962 vs Lolita 1997

Pershkrimi videos:
A slideshow which shows the differences between the Lolita of Kubrick and the Lolita of Lyne
( I do not own any of these pictures, it is purely a fanvid. no copyright infringement intended)

Etiketat: dominique irons james jeremy kubrick lolita lyne lyon mason sue swain
Shikoni te Gjitha Videot e Lililo78

Video te Peraferta:


Lolita - Act 2, Scene 1	Lolita Tribute Video	Scene from LOLITA

Lolita - Act 2, Scene 1	Lolita Tribute Video	Scene from LOLITA

Tregoni per Kete Video ne :

Komentet: Shfaqi || Fshehi

Komentet per kete video ne YouTube

i didn't like her ... ( 1 month ago by princessa94)

i didn't like her at all as Lolita i much prefered Dominique Swain

some points why ... ( 3 weeks ago by CabaretVoltaire391)

some points why kubricks version is the only real version (and i read nabokovs novel in english, french and german)
1. d. swain looks like jeremy irons sister, sue lyon looks like a real fractious nymphet
2. d. swain looks like being 16 while sue lyon looks like being 14
3. lolita 1962 has been made by a genius, lolita 1997 has been made by a donk.
4. in lolita 1962, you can see nabokov contributing in the background.
5. lolita 1962 has peter sellers

I read lolita in ... ( 3 weeks ago by CabaretVoltaire391)

I read lolita in three languages, i can tell you why the "1962" is the only suitable film:
1. kubrick is a genius, adrian lyne aint
2. d. swain looks like j. irons sister, sue lyon looks like a real precocious nymphet
3. d. swain looks like being 16, sue lyon looks at least like being 14
4. the 1962 version has magnificient peter sellers and shelley winters
5. there are plenty of details in the kubrick version which only catch the connoisseurs's eyes.

Array ( 3 weeks ago by CabaretVoltaire391)

62>97

Array ( 3 weeks ago by CabaretVoltaire391)

1962 >>>>
1997

Thanks ... ( 3 weeks ago by Lililo78)

Thanks CabaretVoltaire391 for giving your opinion and for watching my vid.

Damn, why are there ... ( 3 weeks ago by CabaretVoltaire391)

Damn, why are there twice the same comments twice??? donkey youtube

AHAHAha, no problem ... ( 3 weeks ago by Lililo78)

AHAHAha, no problem CabaretVoltaire391! By the way, they are not exactly the same ;)

indeed...can only ... ( 3 weeks ago by CabaretVoltaire391)

indeed...can only have been my own fault :/
sorry, it looks much like spam, that wasnt my aim. but i think i made my point, even throughout multiple comments :P
anyway: thank you lililo for this comparative synthesis of the 'lolita' universe. i enjoyed it!

I prefer 1997 ... ( 3 weeks ago by Liddy1221)

I prefer 1997 version. It shows the age difference and the ill mental situation of HH. Dominique looks young but sexy, pure but evil.

I've seen both. I'm ... ( 3 weeks ago by bday55)

I've seen both. I'm a big fan of Jeremy Irons. I gotta say I liked the 62 film. Shelly Winters was great. Peter Sellers stold whatever scene he was in (as always I guess). The 97 film is really standing on the shoulders of the 62 one. Just on that alone, it could never really be better.
(also..I liked the B&W and Sue Lyons and the Hitchcock feel of it)

is lolita played my ... ( 2 weeks ago by dashawnswifee)

is lolita played my sandra Dee in the '62 version?

Sue Lyon ( 2 weeks ago by holliwow)

Sue Lyon

ive never read the ... ( 2 weeks ago by kes13209)

ive never read the book. is it any good? im trying to find a good book to read

A 14 year old Sue ... ( 2 weeks ago by Hoopskidoodle)

A 14 year old Sue Lyon.

Neither version ... ( 2 weeks ago by Hoopskidoodle)

Neither version show the age difference accurately (Lo was 12 in the book) but the Kubrick version is closer. Sue Lyon was 14 when Lolita was filmed.

The book is ... ( 1 week ago by lexwashere)

The book is awesome.I love thw way V.Nabokov wrote it.This is one of my fav books ever.Hope you'll read it.

Yes, it's a very ... ( 1 week ago by Lililo78)

Yes, it's a very very good book! I read it in 2days! It's a masterpiece, you'll enjoy it!

in both movies she ... ( 1 week ago by funfriend72)

in both movies she was 14. in the book, wasn't she like 12?

Yes, she was 12 in ... ( 1 week ago by Lililo78)

Yes, she was 12 in the beggining of their relationship. But i think They stayed 2years together.

anyone know where i ... ( 6 days ago by putabananainurear)

anyone know where i can find this song?
i can't find it on limewire

I can send you the ... ( 4 days ago by Lililo78)

I can send you the song by email if you want! Give me your email ;)

pues la mera verdad ... ( 2 days ago by visionactual)

pues la mera verdad quien no quisiera tener una lolita, las dos peliculas las protagonistas estan bien buenas.

1997's Lolita is ... ( 13 hours ago by lala00lala00)

1997's Lolita is way much better
it really shows what the book was about and the acting is better too. Dominique gives the role something special, the real "ninfa" style, that Lyon didn't have.
and jeremy is awesome, the other humbert sucks.

Dergoje Videon:

Shqip Music

Muzik Shqip - Shkarko - Degjo - Shiko - Muzik - Videoklipe - Shqip

Lolita 1962 vs Lolita 1997